...
This statistic is almost certainly not extrapolated numbers. They will not have been trying to cover up the cause of death on these people, so it will have been possible to tally up the information exactly. It just drives me nuts when statisticians pull numbers out of their asses and state unequivocally that X number of insane people are going to cause the total breakdown of society by 2050. Shit like that.
You chase one down and ask how he can put out such an outrageous stat, let alone conclude from it what he did, and he tells you it's simple math. Audible sigh. Yeah, the math really IS simple, and so are you.
I'm fine with you telling us about the approximate number of VAERS reports and what percentage of the total number we think that represents, and also giving us the totals in the very alarming excess deaths stats. That's at least giving us a ball park in the size of the cataclysm. But when you have doctors and hospitals and coroners ALL refusing to state honestly the cause of death when it has not been a bullet, how can you go back and put even ballpark numbers if you did not take EACH death and go interview everyone concerned and check all kinds of variable boxes?
Did you just take the estimate of total "vaccinated" and do the simple math with total excess deaths? How do you know they didn't die of failure to smoke enough cigarettes to ward off the nanobots? How do you know it wasn't Gates' frickin' "organic" produce wax knockin' 'em off or any other arcane toxin from our undetecting USDA "inspectors"? Or 5G radiation poisoning? Or cosmic rays from the quasar/black hole at the center of the galaxy?
Why do we have to pretend shit all the time?
It does NOT serve our ability to see and know reality.
pipe up any time....
